mt:Include module="Global Settings" /> June 2010 Archives: Colorado Criminal Lawyer Blog

June 2010 Archives

June 21, 2010

The Slippery Side to Colorado Laws on Bail and Bonding

Recently a Colorado State Senator raised questions regarding the somewhat questionable nature of well entrenched Bondsman (person) practices in Colorado.

Attention has finally been brought to this issue by Channel 9 News in Denver.. they raised this question recently in an investigative report:

DENVER - The game may be over for some bail agents who have been playing the legal system to get removed from bonds so they do not have to pay the court or find fugitives,..

The chairwoman of the state senate judiciary committee plans to take a close look at the law and judicial decisions about bond exonerations' to stop it from happening again unless it is legally warranted.

"You shouldn't be trying to find your way out. There's really a whole system, a function of the entire system that bail bondsmen serve, that when the motivation isn't to honestly produce people or pay up on a bond to get people there, there's a breakdown in the system overall," State Senator Morgan Carroll (D-Aurora) said. She is chair of the State Senate Judiciary Committee.

H. Michael's Take:

Bonding agents play a very valid role in our criminal justice system -- but many times their very high fees exceed even the lawyer's fees in a case and unscrupulous bondspersons will look for any technical way to "get off of a bond" and still keep the 10 to 15 % premium the client has paid the bondsman.

Other times the bondsperson will make no effort to find out why a client has failed to appear in court -- such as a faikly emergency - illness -- another arrest -- etc.. they will find a way to obtain exoneration from the bond leaving the person out the bail premium- loss of their freedom and a permanent failure to appear entry on the ir criminal history

The best course of action? -- ask a reputable Colorado Criminal Defense Lawyer to refer you to a good and reputable bondsman -- there can be no referral fee or any kind of kick back for the referral -- that would be illegal...

June 18, 2010

Colorado Domestic Violence: "But I Have No Criminal History" - The Truth About DV Cases


How many times have I heard a client utter the words - "But I have no criminal history"...as if those words will immunize them from prosecution. And the second most used phrase - "and she is not pressing charges" quickly follows the first.

In this brief entry -- I wll address the first issue --and in a subsequent Blog entry -- I will talk about the second of these issues.

Recently the Denver Post Ran an Article on Domestic Violence.

"The Denver Domestic Violence Fatality Review Committee found in its study that most people who commit murder and then suicide typically have no police record. That means the clues to violent behavior come from understanding the dynamics of domestic violence."

The article spoke about Rick Walters and his former wife who exchanged custody of their three children at his Loveland home on Jan. 27, On that date, Walters shot and killed his ex-wife and two of the kids before turning the gun on himself. Police had never been called to the home, and Walters had no criminal record.

"You can't predict which cases are going to end in tragedy," said Phyllis Roestenberg, staff attorney and pro bono coordinator for the Rocky Mountain Children's Law Center. "There were red flags in the (Walters) case, and you need to take them seriously." Robert Smith, the court-appointed special advocate for the Loveland case, wrote before the killings that Walters needed to "get a firm handle on his anger and a desire for revenge" before he can focus on his parenting.

He also cited concern for Walters' "reported use of the children to express his anger."

Walters' former wife, Anne Formosa, also said that her husband isolated her from friends and family, Smith noted. Smith wrote: "Father continues to feel maligned by Mother, and wants her to reconcile and to return home to resume life the way it was."

Larimer County District Court Judge William Dressel finalized the couple's divorce. He would not discuss the specifics of the case. He did, however, say that both parents rejected the idea of using a neutral site to exchange custody, saying it would be too inconvenient.

H. Michael's Take:

This is the most tragic of all Domestic Violence cases and it is the horror story that every DA, Judge and Probation Officer fear the most.

The truth is that patterns of DV often go unreported for years. The police, the DA and the Judge "assume" that a lack of criminal history is NOT evidence and that DV has occurred and they proceed on the basis that the "victim" has not reported it.. thus, in effect, canceling out the presumption of innocence accorded to Defendant's by the Colorado and US Constitutions.

Sometimes prior acts of Domestic Violence have gone unreported -- sometimes there simply were none...this iis the first. The crux of the issue - and what the Defendant / the accused / the client needs to understand is the culture of the criminal justice system - its mindset.

The system focus's on disbelieving the victim and treating (usually a female) as if they are a child, a liar, or both -- and disregarding the protestaions of this person as if what they have to say is meaningless...is the Government's belief that the Government is "acting on her behalf," "in her best interests" nothwithstanding what she wants!

So here it is .... a lack of criminal history in the context of accusations of domestic violence -- holds little weight in the criminal justice system. The answer? -- this lawyer may seek to have a professional - such as a therapist conduct a private DV evaluation on the client (assuming they can afford same) to establish for the DA , the Court, Probation etc and for settlement purposes only- ( assuming the DA has a case and the incident DID occur and can be proven in court) - that this was an isolated and is unlikely to reoccur. The DV evaluation establishes the credibility of the Defendant's statement - this was an isloated incident and is, truly, isolated.

If you are charged with an act of domestic violence - don't wait and don't hesitate to call or page me 24-7.. H. Michael.

T

June 9, 2010

Colorado DUI Driver Gets 36 Years In the Deaths of Two - The High Cost of the Making The Wrong Decision

The Denver Post recently reported on a sentencing in a drunk driving death in Denver Colorado.

Sandra Jacobson, convicted on nine counts related to the Jan. 28, 2009 traffic deaths of two women taking a cab to Denver International Airport, today was sentenced to 36 years in prison.

Jacobson, whose BAC was estimated at more than three times the legal limit when her truck hit a cab causing the deaths of librarians Kate McClelland, 71, and Kathy Krasniewicz, 54, and injuring cabdriver Nejmudean Abdusalam, was convicted in April.

The District Attorney proved to a jury that a drunken Jacobson sped along at more than 80 mph, lost control of her pickup, swerved across two lanes, clipped the van and drove off.

Jacobson first told police that she'd downed cold medicine, and then insisted she was sober and driving the speed limit, momentarily lost control of her truck after her dog went for a Cheeto -- possibly because the unseen taxi crashed into her -- but never realized she'd made contact with another vehicle.

In Jacobson's version of events, she stopped a short time later at Denver International Airport to ship a puppy to her brother in Texas, then downed a "road pop" she'd inadvertently left in her truck days earlier. That road pop was a bottle of Vitamin Water laced with 99-proof banana schnapps. The Denver Post Online carrried the story.

At Sentencing the presideing judge - Judge McGahey -- handed down one of the stiffest sentences in Colorado history -Sandra Jacobson, convicted on nine counts related to the Jan. 28, 2009 traffic deaths of two women taking a cab to Denver International Airport was sentenced to 36 years in prison.

H. Michaels Take:

The issue in this case is the danger, in a climate of "hang 'em high" of taking a case like this to trial. The judge, at a suppression hearing to decide whether there was probable cause to arrest the Defendant after the accident, and noting that nearly 3 1/2 hours passed between the time police officers first contacted Jacobson and the time she was given a breath test, said that while several police officers testified they did not smell booze on her breath, there was "enough" probable cause to make the arrest and demand the blood/ or brath test.

This ruling reminds us of the extremely low standard for probable cause to arrest in Colorado.

Denver District Judge Shelia Rappaport concluded that despite the fact some officers didn't smell alcohol they observed that she was "nervous, fidgety and acting erratically."

"There was certainly probable cause, based on everything in front of the court," Rappaport said in a hearing this afternoon.

Clients that believe that a case will be dismissed because of an alleged violation of their constitutional rights - sometimes have a case worth pursuing - however, as this case demonstrates -- the risks are high - if - in this day of harsh scrutiny of judges in these cases, that the trial judge will give the defendant the benefit of the doubt..

The decision to pursue a trial or a plea bargain is a tough one and is a decision that should be carefully made with your Colorado Criminal Defense Lawyer..